可恶的哲学论文, 终于搞定了，实在太可恶了！那个老师好绝没有定题目，结果就想得我半死，哲学这东西的确可以“吹水”，而且可以大吹特吹，但没有话题怎么吹。也许有人会随便在网上找篇文章然后就ctrl+c然后ctrl+v搞定，最难为他们的就是多打几个字，那几个字当然就是班别名字啦！为了不方便懒人们，虽然自己的文章不好，虽然自己的文章可以说得上很臭，但在这个“非常”时刻，我是不会把它公布的。我发誓，在2个星期后，当我们交作业以后我一定会把文章放在这里供大家的指点评价。但现在，绝对不可以，首先是不要方便懒人们，其次我真的怕我这个原作者反而被认为是copy那些懒人们的，毕竟自己是原作者，也要维护自己的利益啊！
想太多也不好，所以随便找了个题目就努力了，写的是“美是什么”这其实是老师在一节辩论课的题目，但这个千古哲学问题也挺好说的，干嘛不谈谈呢？
其实我吹水也不是乱吹，起码我也找过资料啊！
我的文章现在不能看，我查过的资料还是可以公开的：
①《现代汉语词典》P863，北京，商务印书馆，1996
② http://www.soci.niu.edu/~phildept/Dye/forms.html
③ http://www.yqzx.net/bbs/topic.asp?topic_id=474&forum_id=14
④ 《思想政治》（全日制普通高级中学教科书[试用本]， [必修]二年级[上册]），P98，广东，人民教育出版社，2002）
最喜欢的就是http://www.soci.niu.edu/~phildept/Dye/forms.html
简直就是超喜欢它的Platonic Forms虽然全部都是英文，还是很有耐性地看完了，原来它的意思并不是很深奥，几乎不用翻译工具，那些所谓专业性词语都是不断出现，所以并不难理解。原来那个柏拉图也不是太深奥，起码我明白了他到底耍什么花招。我还要一边看，一边口译呢！不过当然只有我自己明白自己在说什么，一边听着西文歌，一边做那些哲学东西的口译，我也不知道当时的自己是多么的恐怖，反正，超恐怖就是了。音量一定超大，不过爸妈都知道我在做正经事，没有投诉。不知道他们有没有一点明白我在翻译什么？没有问，看来很有必要问一下。
下面就是摘选的几句（说是几句，几乎是几段了：）Platonic Forms：
Forms as class concepts. If A is a certain woman and B is a certain statue and both “A is beautiful” and “B is beautiful” are true statements, one might be tempted to think of the woman and the statue as participating in or sharing some common property–beauty, despite their being otherwise quite different. This is the way Plato thinks, and he calls the common property ‘beauty itself,’ as distinct from the particular beauty of either woman or statue (unfortunately, translators often feel compelled to turn Plato’s ‘beauty itself’ into “ideal beauty” or “absolute beauty”).
Of course we find ourselves saying things like ‘This woman is beautiful’ and ‘That statue is beautiful,’ long before we have thought about–if we ever do–what ‘the beautiful itself’ (or ‘beauty’) is.
Only “the beautiful itself” is just beauty uncompounded with any other properties.
The concept of beauty, or what Plato calls “the beautiful itself” or “Beauty,” provides a standard with which to judge individual objects as being more or less beautiful. Because they are the patterns or ideal models to which we compare individual things or actions in order to determine how beautiful, just, or whatever, they are, he also refers to them as ‘Forms’ or ‘Ideas.’ For this reason, Plato’s view has been called idealism.
Plato thinks that if Beauty and Justice were only names and not realities then all our aesthetic and moral judgments would only express conventional prejudices and that none of them could be true.
If knowledge is the correct apprehension of what truly exits, and if Forms did not exist, there would not be anything to know, for the only existing objects would be sensible, rather than conceivable, realities.
Scientific statements, as well as the definitions of virtues sought by Socrates in Plato’s dialogues, are not about particular facts or objects but about univerals.
