我的天

觉得自己虽然见过递归，但几乎不用，不逼着我我都不用，循环用得越来越遛。前两题我和参考答案得出的结论一致，最后一题，我觉得参考答案有问题。下面的都是我的脚本。下面要用到的words.txt在这里。

Exercise 7：This question is based on a Puzzler that was broadcast on the radio program Car Talk: Give me a word with three consecutive double letters. I’ll give you a couple of words that almost qualify, but don’t. For example, the word committee, c-o-m-m-i-t-t-e-e. It would be great except for the ‘i’ that sneaks in there. Or Mississippi: M-i-s-s-i-s-s-i-p-p-i. If you could take out those i’s it would work. But there is a word that has three consecutive pairs of letters and to the best of my knowledge this may be the only word. Of course there are probably 500 more but I can only think of one. What is the word? Write a program to find it. Solution: http://thinkpython2.com/code/cartalk1.py.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

def double_letter(word):
    num = 0
    i = 0
    if len(word) >= 6:
        while i < len(word)-1:
            if word[i] == word[i+1]: 
                num = num + 1
                i = i + 2
            elif i > 2 and word[i-2] != word[i-3]:
                break
            else:
                i = i + 1
        if num == 3:
            print(word)
fin = open('words.txt')
n = 0
for line in fin:
    word = line.strip()
    double_letter(word)
# bookkeeper
# bookkeepers
# bookkeeping
# bookkeepings

Exercise 8: Here’s another Car Talk Puzzler: “I was driving on the highway the other day and I happened to notice my odometer. Like most odometers, it shows six digits, in whole miles only. So, if my car had 300,000 miles, for example, I’d see 3-0-0-0-0-0. “Now, what I saw that day was very interesting. I noticed that the last 4 digits were palindromic; that is, they read the same forward as backward. For example, 5-4-4-5 is a palindrome, so my odometer could have read 3-1-5-4-4-5. “One mile later, the last 5 numbers were palindromic. For example, it could have read 3-6-5-4-5-6. One mile after that, the middle 4 out of 6 numbers were palindromic. And you ready for this? One mile later, all 6 were palindromic! “The question is, what was on the odometer when I first looked?” Write a Python program that tests all the six-digit numbers and prints any numbers that satisfy these requirements. Solution: http://thinkpython2.com/code/cartalk2.py.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

def is_palindrome(word):
    if word[::-1] == word:
        return True 
def test_palindrome(number):
    if is_palindrome(str(number)[2:]):
        if is_palindrome(str(number+1)[1:]):
            if is_palindrome(str(number+2)[1:1]):
                if is_palindrome(str(number+3)):
                    return True
for number in range(100000, 999999):
    if test_palindrome(number):
        print(number)
# 198888
# 199999

Exercise 9: Here’s another Car Talk Puzzler you can solve with a search: “Recently I had a visit with my mom and we realized that the two digits that make up my age when reversed resulted in her age. For example, if she’s 73, I’m 37. We wondered how often this has happened over the years but we got sidetracked with other topics and we never came up with an answer. “When I got home I figured out that the digits of our ages have been reversible six times so far. I also figured out that if we’re lucky it would happen again in a few years, and if we’re really lucky it would happen one more time after that. In other words, it would have happened 8 times over all. So the question is, how old am I now?” Write a Python program that searches for solutions to this Puzzler. Hint: you might find the string method zfill useful. Solution: http://thinkpython2.com/code/cartalk3.py.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58

year = 99
meet = int(input('how many times have we met?(1-8): '))
print('mom born me at', '\t','my age', '\t',"mon's age")
for i in range(10, 80): # 假设你妈生你的最低年龄是10，最高年龄是80
    n = 0
    for age in range(1, year):
        if age < int(str(age).zfill(2)[::-1]) and int(str(age).zfill(2)[::-1]) - age == i:            
            # print(i, '\t\t', age, '\t\t', str(age).zfill(2)[::-1])             
            n = n + 1
            if n == meet:
                print(i, '\t\t', age, '\t\t', str(age).zfill(2)[::-1])
 
# how many times have we met?(1-8): 6
# mom born me at   my age          mon's age
# 18               57              75
# 27               58              85
# 36               59              95
 
# how many times have we met?(1-8): 8
# mom born me at   my age          mon's age
# 18               79              97
 
# mom born me at   my age          mon's age
# 18               2               20
# 18               13              31
# 18               24              42
# 18               35              53
# 18               46              64
# 18               57              75
# 18               68              86
# 18               79              97
# 27               3               30
# 27               14              41
# 27               25              52
# 27               36              63
# 27               47              74
# 27               58              85
# 27               69              96
# 36               4               40
# 36               15              51
# 36               26              62
# 36               37              73
# 36               48              84
# 36               59              95
# 45               5               50
# 45               16              61
# 45               27              72
# 45               38              83
# 45               49              94
# 54               6               60
# 54               17              71
# 54               28              82
# 54               39              93
# 63               7               70
# 63               18              81
# 63               29              92
# 72               8               80
# 72               19              91

昨天晚上，在做那些文字游戏的时候，我做到了好像怎么费劲就轻而易举地把题目做出来了，只需要几分钟到十几分钟。从写脚本到测试成功，整个过程没有状况，甚至写完脚本后，所有东西下面红色波浪线都没有。通常，我都会习惯忘记在句子的结束加上冒号。Python要求必须严格缩进，多了少了都不行，而且使用缩进必须用一样的方式，通常必须要求用4个空格。习惯了用VSCode以后，我会设置缩进为4个空格，当我在上一行回车之后，如果上面是冒号，下一行就会自动缩进4个空格。但如果某段代码不是我写的，而是从某个地方复制过来的，就可能会出现状况。所以为了避免这种无聊的出错，我把所有占位符都显示出来。比如空格，也比如tab。大概对其他人来说，写代码就应该是行云流水的。知道自己要实现的功能是什么，知道自己应该用什么方法，然后按照思路按部就班。调试这种东西没有个尽头，没有说用了某些方法测试就能一定保证调试完以后程序没有任何的bug。只能做到尽可能少bug，不可能做到完全没有bug。不知道从什么时候开始，我觉得不把话说死非常重要。

昨天我终于体验到云流水般写代码，是因为在行云流水之前我已经纠结过好几个小时。在行云流水之后，我也遇到了命令行的光标卡在那里，不显示程序有错误，但是程序也不进行下去。如果我进入了死循环，程序出不来，Python会提示我上面已经进行了超过994行，别浪浪费大家精力了。之前我已经见识过了。而昨晚我遇到的是光标停在那里，没有任何提示。脚本那里也没有任何红色波浪线，说明语法是对的，起码静态语法没问题。当我再次看到脚本的时候，发现原来是我在用while进行循环迭代的时候，没有设置改变条件的东西，于是while的循环就停在那里了。在我构想那个循环的时候，其实我是设定好增量条件的。我的脑子已经准备好了，但我的手指并没有把增量条件敲上去，所以就出现了之前死在了终端的状况。我不知道光标死在了终端我还能做些什么，反正我的处理方式是把终端关了。光标停在那里，输入什么都没有反应，又或许如果我在单独的CMD命令行里搞那个的话，我可以用某些什么方式从那里跳出来。只是我现在不知道该做些什么。因为我是在VScode的测试，所以我简单地把那个终端的窗口关掉，重开一个就好。

还记得，在大学里学习C语言的时候，其实我不怎么喜欢用while这个东西循环，我更喜欢用for。拿Python跟C语言比，我觉得后者需要我们在写代码的时候更加仔细严谨。比如花括号这种东西绝对不能省。也比如某个对象在使用之前必须先声明，不只要说明它存在，而且要确定好那是一个什么类型的东西。在循环控制方面，C语言一开始就必须得想好所有。相对而言，Python很自由。昨天我突然发现原来in这个东西可以让if这种语句也具备循环的功能。在实现某个功能的时候，我用了两个for嵌套，而参考答案只用了一个for和一个if，出来的结果完全是一样的。我在两个for里还得加个if做判断，相对参考答案而言，显然就有点臃肿了。

我明明知道做习题会让我死去活来，但是一定程度上，我却在享受那种征服未知的刺激。

题目摆在这里，没有确切的答案，下面是我的解答，对不对不知道。words.txt资源在这里。

There are solutions to these exercises in the next section. You should at least attempt each one before you read the solutions.

Exercise 1: Write a program that reads words.txt and prints only the words with more than 20 characters (not counting whitespace).

Exercise 2: In 1939 Ernest Vincent Wright published a 50,000 word novel called Gadsby that does not contain the letter “e”. Since “e” is the most common letter in English, that’s not easy to do. In fact, it is difficult to construct a solitary thought without using that most common symbol. It is slow going at first, but with caution and hours of training you can gradually gain facility. All right, I’ll stop now. Write a function called has_no_e that returns True if the given word doesn’t have the letter “e” in it. Write a program that reads words.txt and prints only the words that have no “e”. Compute the percentage of words in the list that have no “e”.

Exercise 3: Write a function named avoids that takes a word and a string of forbidden letters, and that returns True if the word doesn’t use any of the forbidden letters. Write a program that prompts the user to enter a string of forbidden letters and then prints the number of words that don’t contain any of them. Can you find a combination of 5 forbidden letters that excludes the smallest number of words?

Exercise 4: Write a function named uses_only that takes a word and a string of letters, and that returns True if the word contains only letters in the list. Can you make a sentence using only the letters acefhlo? Other than “Hoe alfalfa”?

Exercise 5: Write a function named uses_all that takes a word and a string of required letters, and that returns True if the word uses all the required letters at least once. How many words are there that use all the vowels aeiou? How about aeiouy?

Exercise 6: Write a function called is_abecedarian that returns True if the letters in a word appear in alphabetical order (double letters are ok). How many abecedarian words are there?

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103

fin = open('words.txt') # 第1小问
for line in fin:
    if len(line) >= (20+2):
        word = line.strip()
        print(word)
# counterdemonstrations
# hyperaggressivenesses
# microminiaturizations
 
def has_no_e(word): # 第2小问
    for letter in word:
        if letter == 'e':
            return False
    return True
fin = open('words.txt')
all = 0
count = 0
for line in fin:
    word = line.strip()
    all = all + 1
    if has_no_e(word):
        print(word)
        count = count + 1
print(count, 'words without e')
print('{:.0%}'.format(count/all), 'words without e')
# ...
# zymosis
# zymotic
# zymurgy
# 37641 words without e
# 33% words without e
 
def avoids(word, x): # 第3小问，最后一个问题举手投降
    for letterw in word:
        for letterx in x:
            if letterw == letterx:
                return False
    return True
fin = open('words.txt')
x = input('withtout: ')
num = 0
# word = 'jwrojgre' # input('word is ')
# print(avoids(word, x))
for line in fin:
    word = line.strip()
    if avoids(word, x):
        num = num + 1
print(num, 'words without', x)
# withtout: aeiou
# 107 words without aeiou
# count = 0
# import itertools
# for i in itertools.combinations('abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz', 5):
#     print(''.join(i))
#     count = count + 1
# print(count) # 65780个排列组合的可能性啊啊啊啊啊啊
 
 
def uses_only(word, x): # 第4小问
    for letter in word:
        if letter not in x:
            return False
    return True
word = input('word is ')
x = input('uses is ')
print(uses_only(word, x))
# word is abc
# uses is efg
# False
 
def uses_all(word, x): # 第5小问
    for letter in x:
        if letter not in word:
            return False
    return True
fin = open('words.txt')
x = input('must use: ' )
num = 0
for line in fin:
    word = line.strip()
    if uses_all(word, x):
        num = num + 1
print(num, 'words with', x)
# must use: aeiou
# 598 words with aeiou
# must use: aeiouy
# 42 words with aeiouy
 
def is_abecedarian(word): # 第6小问
    index = 1
    while index < len(word) - 1:
        if ord(word[index-1]) > ord(word[index]):
            return False
        index = index + 1
    return True
fin = open('words.txt')
num = 0
for line in fin:
    word = line.strip()
    if is_abecedarian(word):
        num = num + 1
print(num, 'words is abecedarian')
# 1573 words is abecedarian

本来我根本没考虑字母以外的那些怎么办，测试过参考答案以后，发现原来字母以外的东西原始输出，于是我也这般弄了，等于再加一个是否字母的判断，折腾。不告诉人家怎么把字符合并成字符串，我就只好准备两个对象二人转连接。

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

def rotate_word(something, n): # a-z: 97-122, A-Z: 65-90
    newletter1 = ''
    for letter in something:
        if ord(letter) < ord('A') or ord('Z') < ord(letter) < ord('a') or ord('z') < ord(letter):
            newletter2 = newletter1 + letter
        else:
            if ord(letter) + n > ord('z'):
                newletter2 = newletter1 + chr(ord(letter) + n - 26)
            elif ord('a') > ord(letter) + n > ord('Z'):
                newletter2 = newletter1 + chr(ord(letter) + n - 26)
            else:
                newletter2 = newletter1 + chr(ord(letter) + n)
        newletter1 = newletter2
    return newletter2
something = input('please write something: ')
n = int(input('how many shifts do you want: '))
print('before:', something)
print('after :', rotate_word(something, n))
# please write something: IBM
# how many shifts do you want: -1
# before: IBM
# after : HAL
# please write something: g858^h{O
# how many shifts do you want: 6
# before: g858^h{O
# after : m858^n{U

昨天晚上我的确提早回宿舍了，9点多一点我就回宿舍。之前我的打算是7点半就开始运动，那么9点之前我就可以回宿舍，但是，我还是拖延症到了8点才开始。运动很愉快，电影也很愉快。感觉我已经好久都没看过这么愉快的电影。过去好些时间，我都在看国产片，之所以这样，因为我对欧美电影已经失去了兴趣。大多数情况下，我在看国产片，也会看一下印度电影或者韩国电影，日本电影过于文艺，我有点难以接受。难以接受归难以接受，也总比根本不看好。

现在我已经不敢看我自己的记录了，感觉我已经接近了两个月大姨妈没来。到底什么时候要来？我完全说不准，因为貌似一点征兆都没有。唯一能拯救我的就只有早睡。肥胖跟大姨妈两个的关系很暧昧。对我来说，肥胖就意味着大姨妈一定不靠谱，而大姨妈不靠谱就意味着肥胖是条不归路。所以他俩到底是谁先挑起这个死循环，我至今没摸透，但可以确定的是，晚睡直接会导致我的大姨妈不来。要我做到10点半就睡觉几乎是不可能的事。如果我要做到10点半就睡觉，意味着9点半之前我必须回到宿舍，开始洗澡洗衣服，然后做一下其它。从前这对我来说太简单，但现在，这对我来说，不是一般的难。昨晚我的确做到了早回宿舍，我10点之前就已经洗完澡。但问题是，因为今天审计要过来，所以我又加班了一个小时。日常的工作15分钟以内我就搞定了，但余下的事情，不断地核对数据，不断地这个表那个表耗费了我不少时间，虽然我觉得自己的核对思路还是挺清晰的，因为我就只是重复那几件事而已，但是还是要时间。因为是在自己的笔记本上操作。屏幕太小，数字键不是我习惯的小键盘。虽然过去好些时间我已经在努力在练习用字母上面的一行数字，而不只靠小键盘过日子。有些时候，操控那一行数字，我可以做到条件反射，比如在输入日期的时候，2020这个数字我已经很熟练了，但是叫我输入一段数字的时候，我总是要想一想那个数字在哪个位置，应该用哪个手指去点击。大概在这种情况下，你或许会觉得我直接看着那个数字用一根手指按会更快，但是我还是纠结地把10根手指都放在上面，想一想我应该用哪个，眼睛盯着显示器，保证自己没有按错。

已经在这个单位干了12年，这是我第一次遇到审计的人过来查我们的东西。其实准确来说不是我们的东西，那是总公司的东西。审计本来是去查总公司的，但是总公司是一个汇总，所以他们又下到了基层单位去查。过去这些年，我遇到过不少的检查组。因为我们是省直单位，所以相对来说东莞市来查的几率会低一点，虽然我们单位的粮食存量不少，但相对来说，其实跨省和国家来检查的也不是很多。大型的清仓查库都被我碰上了，完全没出现什么状况，因为实际上也没有状况。小型的事务所之类，每年都要来一次。每年上面的监管单位派过来的事务所都不一样，大概是免得我们去搞关系。即便这样的随机抓取，也不曾发现过我们有什么大问题。可能会有一些细节上的差错，比如说手误写错日期之类的。但是根本性的问题一定不会存在。

今天过来查，昨天中午才告诉我有这么件事，才开始叫我们准备。我也说不上这是好还是不好，根本没时间给你准备，那平时是怎样，就怎么去面对。我不知道要紧张些什么，我只是陪同大家一同紧张而已。